/* ========================================================================== Foundation rich text content (AB#99067, analysis section 9.1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Loaded by masterFoundation.cshtml only. Every rule is scoped under .brand-foundation (the Foundation body class) AND #pageBody (the wrapper the Foundation views put rich text output into), so nothing here can reach the ASISA, ESD or Academy layouts even where they render the same shared partial. main.css is NOT modified. That matters more here than in most components: the rules this file overrides (p a, ul, ol, #pageBody p img, .CIfoundationProgrammes li::before) are shared by all four entity sites, and .CIfoundationProgrammes in particular is also used by AcademyProgrammesPage. Do not be fooled by the class names. .foundationProgrammesPage, .CIfoundationProgrammes, .foundationRTE and .foundationTemplate all read as Foundation scopes and none of them are. .brand-foundation on is the only reliable one. What the story asks for (31 Aug 2026 handover, transcripts in the BOK at asisa/transcripts/handover/): - links in body copy are bold and not underlined [part 1, 1:36:17] - bullet and list styling is fixed in the editor configuration and the site CSS, never per page [part 1, 1:33:34] - media uploaded through the editor gets the corner treatment [part 1, 1:25:12] - left and right image wrap keeps working [part 2, 27:43] Design source: NONE. There is no Figma frame or crop for Foundation body copy: design/ holds references for the navigation, breadcrumb, social links, latest news and image gallery only, and the project's Figma seat is a View seat whose monthly call budget is already spent (see design/foundation-rich-text/SOURCE.md). Every value below is therefore either INHERITED from a shared rule that already ships, or an ESTIMATE named as such. Nothing here is invented where the transcript is silent: link hover in particular is deliberately left alone. See SOURCE.md for the open list. ========================================================================== */ .brand-foundation { /* All four corners, not the gallery's three-plus-a-square. The gallery's square top right exists only because the accent triangle's right angle sits in it and rounding clipped the tip (foundation-image-gallery.css, and Michiel reported it on dev on 8 September 2026). A rich text image carries no triangle, so the asymmetry would have nothing behind it. Value matched to --fnd-gallery-radius so editor-placed images and gallery images agree. Decision recorded on the story, 8 September 2026. */ --fnd-rte-image-radius: 24px; } /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Links in body copy (AC: bold, never underlined) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The shared rule at main.css "p a, h1 a, h2 a, h3 a, .moreinfo a, li a, .introLink a, .umb-grid a span" already sets font-weight 700 and text-decoration none !important. The visible underline is NOT a text decoration: it is border-bottom: 2px solid var(--text). A rule that only set text-decoration: none would therefore change nothing at all on screen. The border is what has to go. font-size and line-height are reset to inherit on purpose. The shared rule drops a link to 0.875rem/1.625rem while the paragraph around it is 16px/26px, so a link currently renders two pixels smaller than the sentence it sits in. Janelle described the intended difference as "bold versus not bold as a link... very subtle" [part 1, 1:36:17], which a size change is not. COLOUR IS DELIBERATELY NOT SET. It was set to inherit, and that was a defect Lonwabo Mnyaiza caught in review on 9 September 2026. Five Foundation views paint rich text links in the page's programme colour from an inline